Cranston High school East is a Rhode Island public school, grades from 9th-12th the total enrollment of students is about 1,630 students and about 200 full time teachers.There mascot for the school as you can see above is a thunderbolt and the colors that represent the school are green and white. The initials to represent there school is CHSE. East Cranston is only one out of three Cranston districts. There are two other Public Cranston schools. It is located on 899 Park Avenue Cranston RI. This public school is a good school to join or put your kids in if you want to make the right decision and see how the academic life and social life is just keep reading below and hopefully that information will help with you decison.
Community Data
To start of all this information you want to see if East Cranston Community is the right one for you and your kids. The first information we come across is Income and Poverty. Below you will get more details about it and following is Census based- indicators and last but not least about this community I used Race ethnicity. I chose these three to describe Cranston Community because I believe this are the top three that can sway your decision on East Cranston and prove to you that is is a great community for you and your family.
Income/Poverty (2008-2012):
East Cranston
Rhode Island
US
median
household income
58,772
56,102
53,046
median
Family income
73,857
72,872
64,585
Per capita income
29,218
30,005
28,051
All families below
poverty level
6.6%
9.2
10.9
all people below
the poverty level
10.0%
13.2%
14.9%
In the table above you can see that Cranston isn't that much different than Rhode Island and the Unite States. it is apparent in the chart above that the median household income seems to be higher standing at 58,772 rather than Rhode island standing at 56,102 and even the nation as a whole standing at 53,046. the median family income is even greater as you can its 73,857, and Rhode island isn't much lower it stands at 72,872 but the nation as a whole is a lot lower it stands at 64,585. As seen above Cranston's percentage for all families below poverty level isn't very high which is a good thing, it is 6.6% as Rhode island id higher standing at 9.2% and even the nation as a whole is higher than both Cranston by 4.3% and Rhode Island by 1.7% which is still a wide spread.
Census-based idicators:
East Cranston
Rhode island
Child population
16,414
223,956
Children in single parent families
26%
31%
Children living in families below the federal poverty threshold
11.8%
18.4%
Children living in grandparent headed households
6%
6%
As you can see in the table above the child population is 16,414 and Rhode Island as a whole has 223,956 children, out of those children there are 26% living in single parent family when only 31% of rhode island kids live in single parent families which is showing in the table that a lot of children in Cranston live in a single parent family. For children living in with grandparents households is the same percentage for Cranston and Rhode Island at 6.6%.
Race/Ethnicity:
East Cranston
Rhode Island
United States
White
81.9%
81.4%
72.4%
Black/African Americans
5.3%
5.7%
12.6%
Asian
5.2%
2.9%
4.8
Hispanic or Latino
10.8
12.4%
16.3%
American Indian And Alaska Native
0.3
0.6
0.9
In this table above you can see the Cranston community is a majority of white/ caucasians. The percentage of Cranston For whites is 81.9 % following the Rhode Island percentage isn't far from that is is 81.4 as you can see as a whole nation the percentage is lower than both Cranston and Rhode Island it is 72.4%. In Cranston The African American Race is a enormous different for all three, Cranston, Rhode Island, and the Unites states. As see above you can see the percentage is 5.3% and Rhode Island and a little bit higher standing with 5.7% and as a whole the nation stands for African americans is 12.6%
District Data
NECAP assessments
Rhode Island
Cranston
Barrington
Central Falls
3rd Grade math
56%
55%
79%
29%
4th Grade math
63%
62%%
78%
42%
5th Grade math
61%
64%
85%
37%
6th Grade math
59%
63%
82%
26%
7th Grade math
59%
67%
87%
19%
8th Grade math
57%
61%
90%
15%
11th Grade math
35%
28%
79%
12%
In the table above you can see the percentages of the math grades between Cranston and three other places, Cranston doesn't have the highest scores but they are right about average in the table below you can compare all three and see the differences in the graph you see that Barrington has the highest math test from 3rd until 11th grade and Central falls has the lowest scores. In, the younger years you can see that Rhode Island, Cranston, and Barrignton are too far RI has 63% when Cranston has 62% and 78% then you have Central falls which has 42%.
School Analysis SAT exams:
Rhode Island
Cranston
Barrington
Central Falls
Mathematics
Average
479
480
596
410
Reading
Average
478
485
582
390
Writing
Average
473
485
570
375
For school analysis for Cranston we will take a look at the testing of the AP exams and the SAT exams and how the three other places for further information on how the testing is. As you see below in the colorful Graph for the SAT exams Cranston is either above average or average with Rhode Island.They are pretty similar, but overall Cranston Is ranked higher writing average for Rhode Island is 473 and Cranston average is 485.There SAT scores are in the high than 400 and just with Rhode island and even some of Barrington, which is a good thing to be compared to Barrington, and not Central Falls their Grades are very poor the are lucky to be in the middles of 300 for there SAT scores. Barrington is a great school to be compared to because they grades are so high up there.
AP Exams:
Rhode Island
Cranston
Barrington
Central Falls
Number of
exams taken
6717
87
526
96
Number of
students to
take exam
4150
73
283
74
Exams scored
at college level
mastery
3674
61
465
23
% scored at college level mastery
55%
70%
88%
24%
Part of school Analysis we looked at AP Exams,There are so many numbers. but looking above all these numbers are showing us that Cranston is ranked very high in the AP exams but they are still passing and is a little under state average in overall the state Rhode Island has the most. The number of students that take the exams, there are very few in Cranston east. Rhode Island is 4150 students, Cranston East 73 students, Barrington 283 students and Central falls has 74 students. Rhode Island has a lot more students but if you take a look at the last row in they chart for percentage scored at college level mastery, it doesn't matter how many students take the test in overall it matters who is testing better and Cranston East is right underneath Barringiton following with 77% score at a college level, When Rhode island has thousands of kids taking the AP exams but only 55% of the students score at college level.
Conclusion
As you read this report you can think you own opinion but Cranston is a average school. Yes, they don't have the highest grades, but they are atleast average and in some subject like math they are above average.Comparing schools to Barrington isn't an easy thing because they are high up there but then comparing it to central falls makes you look like the best school, so it averages it out and I would Say Cranston isn't too far behind Barrington. Hopefully these graphs and grades and poverty charts shows that Cranston is still a good town and has good schooling for your children. If living in Rhode Island i would recommend you to chose Cranston high school East, they are very school spirited and there academic level is good and it prepared you for college.
Introduction: 4/5 points 5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community.
0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction:
Organization: 5/5 points 5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References.
4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence.
3: Report is missing one section.
2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each.
1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization:
Mechanics: 0/5 points 5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report.
There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax.
4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning.
3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning.
2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning.
0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions:
Creativity: 5/5 5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report.
4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report.
3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity:
I like the colorfulness !
Conclusion: 4/5 5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community
3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings.
1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school.
0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion:
Data/Analysis: 10/10 5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average).
4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures.
3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures. Name: Editor Sam Gunson Score: 26/35
Introduction: 5/5 points 5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community.
0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction:
Organization: 5/5 points 5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References.
4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence.
3: Report is missing one section.
2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each.
1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization:
Mechanics: 0/5 points 5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report.
There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax.
4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning.
3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning.
2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning.
0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions: I would reread outloud because you will notice your small littlle errors
Creativity: 5/5 5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report.
4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report.
3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity:
Conclusion: _5/5 5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community
3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings.
1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school.
0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion:
Data/Analysis:6/10 5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average).
4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures.
3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Comments on data/analysis/General comments: Peer Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
Name: David Benford Score: 23/35
Introduction: 4/5 points 5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community.
0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction:
Organization: 3/5 points 5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References.
4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence.
3: Report is missing one section.
2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each.
1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization:
no references section
Mechanics: 0/5 points 5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report.
There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax.
4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning.
3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning.
2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning.
0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions:
Creativity: 5/5 5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report.
4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report.
3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity:
Conclusion: 5/5 5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community
3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings.
1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school.
0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion:
Data/Analysis: 6/10 5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average).
4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures.
3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Background information:
Cranston High school East is a Rhode Island public school, grades from 9th-12th the total enrollment of students is about 1,630 students and about 200 full time teachers.There mascot for the school as you can see above is a thunderbolt and the colors that represent the school are green and white. The initials to represent there school is CHSE. East Cranston is only one out of three Cranston districts. There are two other Public Cranston schools. It is located on 899 Park Avenue Cranston RI. This public school is a good school to join or put your kids in if you want to make the right decision and see how the academic life and social life is just keep reading below and hopefully that information will help with you decison.
Community Data
To start of all this information you want to see if East Cranston Community is the right one for you and your kids. The first information we come across is Income and Poverty. Below you will get more details about it and following is Census based- indicators and last but not least about this community I used Race ethnicity. I chose these three to describe Cranston Community because I believe this are the top three that can sway your decision on East Cranston and prove to you that is is a great community for you and your family.
Income/Poverty (2008-2012):
household income
Family income
poverty level
the poverty level
In the table above you can see that Cranston isn't that much different than Rhode Island and the Unite States. it is apparent in the chart above that the median household income seems to be higher standing at 58,772 rather than Rhode island standing at 56,102 and even the nation as a whole standing at 53,046. the median family income is even greater as you can its 73,857, and Rhode island isn't much lower it stands at 72,872 but the nation as a whole is a lot lower it stands at 64,585. As seen above Cranston's percentage for all families below poverty level isn't very high which is a good thing, it is 6.6% as Rhode island id higher standing at 9.2% and even the nation as a whole is higher than both Cranston by 4.3% and Rhode Island by 1.7% which is still a wide spread.
Census-based idicators:
Race/Ethnicity:
In this table above you can see the Cranston community is a majority of white/ caucasians. The percentage of Cranston For whites is 81.9 % following the Rhode Island percentage isn't far from that is is 81.4 as you can see as a whole nation the percentage is lower than both Cranston and Rhode Island it is 72.4%. In Cranston The African American Race is a enormous different for all three, Cranston, Rhode Island, and the Unites states. As see above you can see the percentage is 5.3% and Rhode Island and a little bit higher standing with 5.7% and as a whole the nation stands for African americans is 12.6%
District Data
School Analysis
SAT exams:
Average
Average
Average
AP Exams:
exams taken
students to
take exam
at college level
mastery
Conclusion
As you read this report you can think you own opinion but Cranston is a average school. Yes, they don't have the highest grades, but they are atleast average and in some subject like math they are above average.Comparing schools to Barrington isn't an easy thing because they are high up there but then comparing it to central falls makes you look like the best school, so it averages it out and I would Say Cranston isn't too far behind Barrington. Hopefully these graphs and grades and poverty charts shows that Cranston is still a good town and has good schooling for your children. If living in Rhode Island i would recommend you to chose Cranston high school East, they are very school spirited and there academic level is good and it prepared you for college.
References
Cranston East High School (2014) http://cpsed.net/chse/
RI Kids Count. (2012-2013). Retrieved from http://www.rikidscount.org/matriarch/default.asp
United States Census Bureau. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/
Votta, P. (2013). Info works! Rhode Island Education Data Reporting. Retrieved from http://infoworks.ride.ri.gov/
Name: Prisca Yangambi Score: 28/35
Introduction: 4/5 points
5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community.
0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction:
Organization: 5/5 points
5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References.
4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence.
3: Report is missing one section.
2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each.
1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization:
Mechanics: 0/5 points
5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report.
There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax.
4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning.
3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning.
2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning.
0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions:
Creativity: 5/5
5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report.
4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report.
3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity:
I like the colorfulness !
Conclusion: 4/5
5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community
3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings.
1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school.
0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion:
Data/Analysis: 10/10
5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average).
4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures.
3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Name: Editor Sam Gunson Score: 26/35
Introduction: 5/5 points
5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community.
0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction:
Organization: 5/5 points
5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References.
4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence.
3: Report is missing one section.
2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each.
1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization:
Mechanics: 0/5 points
5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report.
There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax.
4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning.
3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning.
2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning.
0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions:
I would reread outloud because you will notice your small littlle errors
Creativity: 5/5
5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report.
4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report.
3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity:
Conclusion: _5/5
5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community
3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings.
1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school.
0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion:
Data/Analysis:6/10
5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average).
4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures.
3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Comments on data/analysis/General comments:
Peer Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
Name: David Benford Score: 23/35Introduction: 4/5 points
5: Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4: Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3: Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2: Intro fails to name the school, district, and/or community.
0: No introduction section is apparent.
Comments on report's introduction:
Organization: 3/5 points
5: Report includes the following sections: Introduction, Community, District, School, Conclusion, References.
4: Report includes all sections but does not break information into paragraphs, has few transitions, or is otherwise lacking in coherence.
3: Report is missing one section.
2: Report is not divided into sections but contains some information on each.
1: Report is missing two or more sections.
Comments on report's organization:
no references section
Mechanics: 0/5 points
5. All information is cited using APA in-text citations. A properly formatted References section appears at the end of the report.
There are few typos or errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax.
4: Most information is cited and referenced using APA format. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax but they do not interfere with meaning.
3: Some information is not cited or referenced. APA format not followed or followed incorrectly. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax that interfere with meaning.
2: Most of the information is not cited. APA formatting is negligible or nonexistent. Multiple errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax interfere with meaning.
0: No citations. No references. Myriad errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax make the report a chore to read.
Comments on report’s mechanics/conventions:
Creativity: 5/5
5. Report is engaging and colorful. Charts, graphs, and images add professionalism and interest and are well integrated into the report.
4: Report contains some interesting sections. Charts, graphs and images are relevant and add interest to the report.
3: Report appears dull. Information is reported in a disengaged manner. Charts, graphs, and images add little to the report.
Comments on report's creativity:
Conclusion: 5/5
5: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4: Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community
3: Conclusion does not report back to report's findings.
1: Conclusion simply praises or condemns the school.
0: No conclusion.
Comments on report's conclusion:
Data/Analysis: 6/10
5: Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and compares each figure with another relevant figure (e.g. state or national average).
4: Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and compares most figures with relevant figures.
3: Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
2: Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0: Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Comments on data/analysis/General comments: